NEWRecognition — recognise hard work and the people going above and beyond
FacilityOptixFacilities software
Assets & systems

What is maintenance history?

Maintenance history is the record of everything done to an asset — planned tasks, repairs, parts and certificates — held against the asset rather than against the date.

maintenance history — diagram Maintenance history is the record of everything done to an asset — planned tasks, repairs, parts and certificates — held against the asset rather than against the date. Identified on site Criticality Remaining life Maintenance history Warranty and O&M Condition survey
Maintenance history, shown against an asset and its records.
Use this diagram

Free to use on your own site, in training material or in a handout, as long as the credit link stays on it. Paste this where you want the diagram to appear.

<figure>
  <img src="https://facilityoptix.co.uk/glossary/maintenance-history/diagram.svg" alt="maintenance history — diagram from FacilityOptix" width="880" height="620" loading="lazy">
  <figcaption>
    <a href="https://facilityoptix.co.uk/glossary/maintenance-history">What is maintenance history?</a> — diagram by
    <a href="https://facilityoptix.co.uk">FacilityOptix</a>
  </figcaption>
</figure>

Holding it against the asset is what makes it useful. A chronological log of jobs answers what happened last Tuesday; a history against an asset answers whether this pump keeps failing.

It is the evidence for several other things: the condition assessment, the life forecast, the warranty position, and whether a statutory duty has been met.

It survives contract changes only if it belongs to the client. History held in a contractor's own system leaves with them, which is a real loss at every retender.

In practice

An asset being considered for replacement.

The question is whether it has been reliable. The history is spread across two CAFM systems, a contractor's own records and a filing cabinet.

A history that cannot be assembled is a history that cannot inform a decision, so the decision gets made on impressions.

Continuity of records through contractor changes is worth more than any single contractor's reporting.

What goes wrong in practice

  • Records held by job rather than by asset, so patterns are invisible.
  • History held in the incumbent contractor's system and lost at handover.
  • Parts fitted not recorded, so nobody knows what is actually in the asset.